Autonomous cars and man’s future: The road ahead

With autonomous, self-driving cars likely to be commonplace by around 2025, these vehicles will change our roads, our relationship with our cars and society at large. Buckle up, a revolution is coming!

It’s no dramatic hyperbole to suggest that the automotive industry is destined to change more in the next 20 years than it has in the last 100. For a century, cars have consisted of a reasonably simple combination of four wheels, engine, steering system and pilot. Human and mechanics.

But the introduction of GPS technology alongside infrared and radar scanning, high definition cameras and, most importantly, the processing tech to stitch it all together has resulted in a truly disruptive game changer: the autonomous car.

mercedes-driverless-1Google, for instance, has chalked up over 700,000 autonomous miles in their (totally coincidentally) smiley faced, unthreatening driverless car, and this January Audi made a big fuss about driving the 569 miles from San Francisco to this year’s CES tech show in Las Vegas in an autonomous A7.

Volvo are running a scheme where 100 new owners will drive 50km of roads around Gothenburg autonomously in their new XC90s. Every automotive company right now is planning for the inevitable, in various stages of urgency.

The consensus – and there really is more heat generated around this issue than light – is that 2025 will most likely be when autonomous vehicles reach critical mass, sharing the road with human piloted vehicles.

However, as the most highly regulated industry on the planet, it won’t be the automobile manufacturers who will dictate the schedule, or even consumers, but the world’s governments. And right now they are in no hurry to direct resources into figuring out new driving laws.

Or the mind-boggling cost of overhauling our entire road system, traffic management and signposting. Or insurance regulations. Or driving tests. Or road tax. Or liability issues. Or…

Unexpected dangers of a driverless world

But suppose, for a minute, we live in a world of 100% fully automated cars, where human involvement is defunct. What will this world look like?

It won’t be the automobile manufacturers who will dictate the schedule, or even consumers, but the world’s governments

Well, first and foremost, it’s a much safer place to be. Road death is the eighth leading cause of death on the planet, with between 90% and 95% of car accidents the fault of human error. The economic cost of road accidents is estimated to be around $277bn in 2013.

So let’s do some fag packet maths, looking, logically at an industrialised western country like the UK. In 2013 there were 1,713 reported road traffic fatalities in the UK – the lowest since records began. (See! Cars are getting safer.) So allowing for the 5% of non-human error fatalities, that’s 1,627 fewer deaths on the road and virtually no injuries caused by accidents. Which is nothing short of terrific.

Great, right? Well, not if you’re a transplant ward in a hospital, and you rely on car accidents for your organs.

In Boston, for instance, 33 of their 267 organ donors were the result of car accidents. And if that still seems low, there were 105 organs harvested for transplant from those, amazingly generous people.

But where there’s tragedy, there’s opportunity. Indeed, Bre Pettis, founder and CEO of the 3D printing company Makerbot told Fortune that the process of 3D printing organs will have to come of age as a direct result of this shortfall in organ donations.

“We have this huge problem that we sort of don’t talk about, that people die all the time from car accidents,” says Pettis. “It’s kind of insane. But the most interesting thing is, if we can reduce accidents and deaths, then we actually have a whole other problem on our hands of, ‘Where do we get organs?’ I don’t think we’ll actually be printing organs until we solve the self-driving car issue.”

Designing the driverless city

City design will change enormously, even just in the short term. With great swathes of city real estate covered in car parks, self parking cars can cut down on that dramatically.

Without pesky humans parking selfishly, they can ease themselves into tiny spaces with just centimetres to spare. This frees up an enormous swathe of real estate that could be dug up and turned into parks, public spaces and real estate. Okay, mostly real estate.

That’s if cars need to be parked at all. The existence of car parks is based on the assumption that people own cars, or that cars will still remain parked for the current 95% of their lives that they lie dormant, as is the current situation.

Without pesky humans parking selfishly, they can ease themselves into tiny spaces with just centimetres to spare

Speeding fines? Thing of the past. Parking fines? Gone. Going through red lights? Well, there’ll be no need for traffic lights, signs or any other road based paraphernalia. Cars will all be interlinked on a terrifying global network, passing safety and orderly at junctions in an “After you. No, after you”-dance of software-driven politeness. This, of course, means none of that revenue going into the gaping maw of local council coffers.

“Great! Bugger them!” You say. Well, no. A huge amount of this revenue is invested into transport infrastructure and road maintenance. That revenue will have to be levied somewhere and somehow. See also fuel duty and car tax, also on the route of the dodo.

An RAC report estimated that in calendar year 2012, £24.78bn was raised in Fuel Duty and £5.87bn in VED (Vehicle Excise Duty, otherwise known as car tax) in the UK.

This totaled £30.65bn ($47.51bn), which will have to be recouped somewhere. We want to use the roads. They have to be paid for.

Fuel savings will be immense. Autonomous cars drive consistently and economically, without man’s strange insistence of moving one, righteous, car up the queue by overtaking, and aggressively lane-changing.

Morgan Stanley projected autonomous cars could save the US $170bn in lower fuel costs, and another $138bn in congestion avoidance. And that’s just fossil fuels. Which could also be a thing of the past.

Rise of the renewable car

A glance at one of the most disruptive entrepreneurs on the planet – Elon Musk – provides an indication of the future of automobile power, and it’s clean and renewable.

With the release of Tesla’s home battery, linked to a solar charger, his vision is to power cars, free and cleanly, via solar power stored in a highly capacity battery in your home.

And that’s just scratching the surface of electric power. Another option to charge your car is wireless induction charging – a primary coil is ferreted away in your garage floor, a secondary coil is incorporated into the floor of the car, and an alternating magnetic field charges the battery.

Eventually roads will be embedded with these chargers, with motorways actually juicing the car up as you use them.

Meanwhile, huge, flowery solar panel pavilions are being developed for cars, which unpack out of the boot, unfurl while they’re parked and juice them where they stand.

Another option is putting lights onto the roofs of cars which charge during the day and replace street lamps at night. What a concept!

Self-piloted cars will also be enormously empowering for sectors of society traditionally challenged by mobility issues. The disabled, old and blind, for instance, will be able to get anywhere, giving unprecedented freedom.

Drink-driving only exists while driving exists. And contrary to long-held beliefs of autonomous cars driving like nanas, with fewer accidents, and computer-making decisions limited only by physics and the decision-making speed of silicon, speed limits could be raised to what today would be considered insane heights.

Liability in the world of the self-driving car

The insurance industry is, as you’d imagine, watching developments with an arched eyebrow. And again, it’s not what you’d think.

Personal insurance will mostly likely become defunct, because as the car takes responsibility for safety, liability will shift to the manufacturers themselves, with the ABI – the Association of British Insurers telling Factor: “The key change – and the potential shift to product liability – comes when the driver is not expected to oversee or monitor the vehicle and when they have ceded full driving responsibility to the car itself.

The insurance industry is, as you’d imagine, watching developments with an arched eyebrow

“Our initial view is that if a system fails on a fully autonomous vehicle causing it to crash, liability would rest with the vehicle or system manufacturer. This potential shift in liability would only occur when a driver has actively given complete control to the vehicle and has no option to intervene.

“So whether or not there is a complete shift in liability from the driver to the vehicle is likely to depend on whether there is a clear option for the driver to intervene.”

But if we no longer buy cars, how can a manufacturer generate enough money to even cover this liability? Grey waters, indeed.

Driverless cars on the commute

Our interactions with cars will change forever. Do you commute? Well congestion will be eliminated.

Paul Godsmark, CAVCOE’s chief technology officer of the Canadian Automated Vehicles Centre Of Excellence told the Driverless Transportation website that just a step change in autonomous vehicle sharing from the current 1.2 people to 1.8, a 50% increase, would “remove most congestion from most cities. That’s the big win for autonomous vehicles.”

Those who still commute will claim back an average of 50 minutes a day in their cars. Where you’d be chewing the steering wheel or headbanging to Bohemian Rhapsody on the radio, now you can work, read, send emails, even work out.

Images courtesy of Mercedes-Benz

Images courtesy of Mercedes-Benz

With space in cars totally freed up – most design constraints like windscreens, safety pillars, number of doors etc. are based around a human driver – why wouldn’t you stick an exercise bike or a treadmill in your car? Good news for your waistband, not so much for drive-time DJs.

‘Sleeper cars’ will become available for long journeys where you’ll simply set off at night, tuck yourself into the incorporated bed, with blacked-out windows if there are windows at all, and wake up right outside your destination, be it Land’s End to John O’Groats, or a cross-Europe trip.

Automation driving job losses

Freight will be completely automated, putting every single lorry driver out of work. Deliveries will be automated, using the highways at night when there’s no congestion and economies of scale can be greater, without pesky regulations forcing weak-bodied professional drivers to take breaks.

If you drive for a living right now, can we politely suggest starting to look for a new vocation?

Pizza deliveries: automated. All deliveries: automated. If you drive for a living right now, can we politely suggest starting to look for a new vocation?

Indeed, individual car ownership with almost certainly wither and die. As autonomous cars become less an expression of your personality, bound by useage, design, handling and power and more an amorphous, vanilla everycar, there’ll be increasingly less reason to own one.

Even now, Millennials are far more interested in investing in the latest smartphone, tablet or wearable than anchoring themselves to five years’ more debt to purchase a car they rarely use, have little interest in and are taxed up the wazoo to keep.

We’ll change our entire relationship with the automobile, from something intensely personal into a commodity like a toothbrush or a saucepan.

Tim Dant, retired professor of sociology at Lancaster University told Factor: “The driverless car will change the intimate relationship that has developed during the 20th century between the user and their automobile.

“No longer will the embodied control over the device, the selection of route and manner of driving that makes it ‘mine’, be an expression of personality and identity. Instead it will be an autonomous machine that does the user’s bidding in its own systematised way.”

“Traffic congestion and ever-stricter controls over speed, parking and manoeuvring have already reduced the number of people who are excited about driving and the standardisation of design and functionality has reduced the consumer’s pleasure in choosing the right car for them,” Dant continues.

“What is more, in an increasingly privatised society the interaction between drivers on the road is a mode of ‘being in public’ that will disappear with the driverless car. It will of course make it much easier to ‘go by car’, but much more important will be the economic and social impact of the loss of skilled jobs – taxi drivers, bus drivers and lorry drivers for example – as business realises that a driverless vehicle can be operated at all hours with less risk and less cost.”

Privacy in the driverless world

Rather than own a vehicle, you’ll most likely whip out your smartphone and call an automated car, just like we would an Uber taxi today. Prod your destination into the app and off you’ll go, automatically billed at the end.

Sounds great, again? Hold up. This has severe implications to your freedom of information.

Planning to commit a crime? Don’t travel there or back in an autonomous car

With all cars packing GPS and your starting point, destination and current position all tied to an app, the provider of that app, and by association the government and police, can and will have a record of your position at every second of your journey.

Planning to commit a crime? Don’t travel there or back in an autonomous car.

The automobile changed the world, becoming a 20th century utopian ideal, delivering freedom and independence. Autonomous driving will turn the car into a commodity, a simple, smart, human-replacing means to an end, and our society is going to be feeling the impact for decades. Exciting times.

Unlike Factor, Americans don’t seem that keen on transhumanist technologies

According to a survey by Pew Research Center, Americans are more worried than excited when it comes to humans using emerging technologies to advance themselves.

The research agency’s survey examined public reaction to three emerging technologies and procedures that could enhance humans: gene editing, implanting brain chips and transfusions of synthetic blood.

All three technologies have the potential to reduce humans’ risk of disease or to augment natural abilities, but according to the survey 68% of Americans would be “very” or “somewhat” worried about gene editing, while 69% and 63% feel the same way about brain chips and synthetic blood respectively.

Less than half of the respondents asked said that they would be enthusiastic about the new technologies.


“Developments in biomedical technologies are accelerating rapidly, raising new societal debates about how we will use these technologies and what uses are appropriate,” said associate director of research at Pew Research Center, Cary Funk.

“This study suggests Americans are largely cautious about using emerging technologies in ways that push human capacities beyond what’s been possible before.”

The Pew study also looked deeper into why Americans’ viewed these potential breakthroughs in science as controversial new technologies.

One reason, given by 73% of respondents, was that they believed these enhancements could increase the divide between haves and have-nots.

More specifically, they believe inequality will increase if brain chips become available because, initially, they will only be available to the wealthy.


Surprisingly though, opinion was divided on the fundamental question of whether these potential developments are meddling with nature and cross a line that should not be crossed.

Just under half (49%) of the survey’s respondents said transfusions with synthetic blood, that contributed to improved physical abilities, would be meddling with nature, but roughly the same number of people (48%) said the new technologies were no different than other ways humans have tried to better themselves, such as cosmetic surgery or laser-eye treatment.

These numbers rose when a respondent identified themselves as religious, and six-in-ten or more of those high in religious commitment considered these potential enhancements to be meddling with nature.

Solar Impulse completes world’s first round-the-world fuel-less flight

Solar Impulse 2 (Si2), the solar plane capable of flying without fuel, has completed its pioneering round-the-world trip, becoming the first aircraft to circumnavigate the globe running entirely on solar power.

The plane, piloted by Solar Impulse chairman and initiator Bertrand Piccard, landed in Abu Dhabi at 4:05am local time this morning, completing a journey that first saw it take off from the country on 9th March 2015.

In the time since, Si2 has completed the journey in 17 separate legs, covering a total of 43,041km (26,744 miles). Piloting duties have been shared between Piccard and Solar Impulse CEO and co-founder André Borschberg, who took turns to pilot the single-seater plane and amassed a total of 23 days of flight.

Solar Impulse 2 passes over the Red Sea on its final leg from Egypt to Abu Dhabi

Solar Impulse 2 passes over the Red Sea on its final leg from Egypt to Abu Dhabi

In doing so, Solar Impulse has demonstrated the potential applications of solar power, a core goal of the project.

“Flying one leg with a completely new type of airplane is difficult enough, but flying around the world is a real challenge. More than a demonstration, it’s the confirmation that these technologies are truly dependable and reliable,” said Borschberg.

The project has attracted considerable support from a number of major organisations, including the United Nations.

“Solar Impulse has flown more than 40,000 kilometers without fuel, but with an inexhaustible supply of energy and inspiration. This is a historic day for Captain Piccard and the Solar Impulse team, but it is also a historic day for humanity,” said UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in a call to the cockpit during the final leg.

André Borschberg (left) celebrates the completion of the record-breaking trip Bertrand Piccard

André Borschberg (left) celebrates the completion of the record-breaking trip Bertrand Piccard

Si2  was not an ordinary flight experience. The pilot of each leg had to spend the entirety of the flight in the 3.83m³ cockpit, wearing extensive cold weather gear to protect them from the elements and often making use of an oxygen mask.

They were also only able to take short naps, despite some of the journeys taking several days. The longest leg saw Borschberg fly non-stop for five days and five nights over the Pacific Ocean from Japan to Hawaii; a trip that broke several records in the process. Piccard too broke records when he became the first person to cross the Atlantic in a solar plane several months later.

The trip was also not without problems. Originally only 16 legs were planned, but a sudden weather change during Borschberg’s Pacific crossing meant he needed to make an unplanned landing in Japan, and battery damage sustained when the Pacific crossing was resumed meant that although Si2 landed successfully in Hawaii, the team had to pause the trip for nine months to conduct significant repairs and wait for winter to pass.

The plane in Abu Dhabi, after arriving in the early hours of this morning

The plane in Abu Dhabi, after arriving in the early hours of this morning

The Solar Impulse team is understandably jubilant. The project has involved hundreds of people, many of whom have worked tirelessly from Solar Impulse’s mission HQ in Monaco, and has been overwhelmingly successful.

However now the project is complete, the team plans to further its goal of encouraging clean technologies. The team has already established the International Committee for Clean Technologies, which will build on Solar Impulse’s work in this area, and is also looking to develop some of the tech created for Si2 for commercial applications, such as solar powered drones.

“This is not only a first in the history of aviation; it’s before all a first in the history of energy,” said Piccard.

“I’m sure that within 10 years we’ll see electric aeroplanes transporting 50 passengers on short to medium haul flights. But it’s not enough. The same clean technologies used on Solar Impulse could be implemented on the ground in our daily life to divide by two the CO2 emissions in a profitable way. Solar Impulse is only the beginning, now take it further! ”

Piccard poses for the last of many in-flight selfies. Images courtesy of Solar Impulse

Piccard poses for the last of many in-flight selfies. Images courtesy of Solar Impulse

Borschberg also shared his views about the future of air transportation.

“There is so much potential for the aeronautical world: while one hundred percent solar-powered aeroplanes might take longer to materialize, electric aeroplanes will develop in the near future because of their tremendous advantages such as energy efficiency,” he said.

“Solar Impulse is of course very well positioned to contribute to the next generations of manned or unmanned electric aircrafts. By capitalizing on the engineering skills and expertise gained over the past decade, we will continue to work to encourage concrete innovations and disruptive solutions.”

Drone-enabled fly-fishing now a reality with DJI Phantom 4: Fishing Edition

The future has come to the forward thinking fisherman’s toolkit, in the form of the DJI Phantom 4:  Fishing Edition. While DJI’s Phantom 4 has been a huge hit, becoming one of the most popular drones of 2016, this is the first time it has been sold with custom fishing accessories included.

The package, which was created by UK drone retailer DronesDirect, includes an integrated electronic fishing spool that allows users to fish remotely, with the drone operable up to 100m above water level and up to 2km away.

Additionally, the drone contains integrated sensors to indicate when the bait has been bitten, automatic stabilisation against winds up to 20mph and a camera that allows for remote viewing of live footage. Finally, the Phantom 4 boasts a return home feature that allows it to automatically return to its commander, avoiding obstacles along the way.

“For those who enjoy fishing, the DJI Phantom 4: Fishing Edition is a bespoke package not to miss out on,” said Tim Morley, managing director at DronesDirect.

“It is a sure way to add extra excitement and an additional fun element to a great hobby, whilst allowing users to sit back, relax and reap the rewards of this drone fishing buddy.”

“The new way to fish allows users to tap into schools of fish up to 2km from shore without the use of a boat. It also enables adventurers to explore areas of sea and terrain not covered by existing maps and plans. We have enjoyed creating the perfect fisherman’s companion and are delighted to be offering this package to the public.”


Images courtesy of DronesDirect

The price of this companion package? Just £15,000, bringing you the drone itself, along with an integrated electronic fishing spool, fishing wire and hooks, as well as the usual remote controller, battery and accessories that Phantom 4 is normally packaged with.

Whether that’s a price that many will be willing to pay remains to be seen. Drone enthusiasts have already proven that it is possible to develop home-made attachments to enable drone fishing, which suggests that while there is an interest in such a product, it may be too steep a price to match the need.

They say that if you give a man a fish, he’ll eat for a day but if you teach him to fish, he’ll eat for life. Presumably, if you teach a man to fish with a drone, he’ll make YouTube videos of it. He may however, also catch fish weighing up to 200g without ever having to stray too far from the comforts of the shore.